Comprehensive Plan  
 

Phillips Survey Results

Purpose

A survey was conducted to measure public opinion in Phillips about issues facing the town in the coming years, so that the Town's comprehensive plan will adhere as closely as possible to the wishes of the voting residents of the town.

Methods

The survey was distributed by mail in December 2003 to more than 400 addresses in Phillips. The names and addresses were gathered from various sources including the 911 list of town residents and the voter registration list. In addition, people were able to pick up a survey in the town office. There were four drop-off places for the surveys, the United King Field Bank, the Phillips Library, the Town Office, and Edmund's Grocery Store. Ninety-seven respondents answered the survey. Not every respondent answered every question on the survey, since all questions were optional. The survey's results were tabulated by Shelby Rousseau, and this report and analysis is written by Maria McManus.

Characteristics of Respondents

Most of the respondents, about a quarter of them, live on the Salem Road.

Where in Phillips do you live?

Route 142 Salem Road

24

No answer

18

Tory and Wheeler Hills

17

Number 6/Bear Hill

10

Toothaker Pond

8

Pinkham / Dill

7

Bridge Street / Rout 149

7

Route 142 Weld Road

6

 

The overwhelming majority live in single family homes.

What kind of home do you live in?

Single-family home

76

Two-family home

4

Mobile home

4

Retirement community

1

No answer

12

 

The majority has lived in Phillips for more than 20 years.

How long have you lived in Phillips?

Less than a year

3

1-2 years

5

3-5 years

8

6-10 years

6

11-20 years

14

More than 20 years

50

Most of the adults in the respondents' households were employed full or part time, but a significant number, one third, were retired.

Employment status of adults in household

Employed full-time

50

Retired

46

Self-employed

20

Full-time homemaker

14

Employed part-time

15

Student

9

Unemployed

8

This can equal more than 97.

More than half of the adults in the respondents' households had had no level of college education.

Education level of adults in household

Less than high school

4

Some high school

12

High school

46

Vocational or technical training

11

Some college

28

Undergraduate degree

21

Graduate degree

11

This can equal more than 97.

 

Of the 72 people who answered the question about the annual household income, most earned less than $35,000.

What is the total income of your household?

Less than $10,000

5

$10-000 - 24,999

21

$25,000 - 34,999

19

$35,000 - 49,999

9

$50,000 - 74,999

14

$75,000 +

4

 

Most of the respondents attended the town meeting at least sometimes, but more than a third said they almost never attend town meetings.

Do you attend town meetings?

Every year

Sometimes

Almost never

28

25

33

Results of the Survey

General Character

More than half of the respondents indicated that their most important reasons for living in Phillips was the Rural Character and the Low Crime Rate.

How important to you are these reasons for living in Phillips?

Very Imp

Important

Not Imp

Rural Character

53

21

6

Low Crime Rate

53

23

2

Property Tax Rate

40

27

7

Close to Family and friends

37

30

17

Affordable Housing

33

30

12

Quality of School System

26

23

21

Attractiveness of Town

26

37

12

Close to Farmington

25

31

24

Town services

21

40

14

Near Job

20

25

30

 

When asked what qualities best define the character of Phillips, respondents most often chose Scenic Views, Quietness, Hard-Working People.

What qualities best define the character

Scenic views

33

Quietness

31

Hard working people

25

Friendliness

22

Plentiful forest

22

Everybody knows everybody

20

Little traffic

19

Sense of belonging

19

Crime-free

17

Lack of development

17

Children playing free

12

Historic building

10

Farmland

8

Non-industrial

7

 

The great consensus of the town is that most important issue Phillips will face in the next 10 years is Job Opportunities. 70 respondents identified it as a very important issue. There was more agreement on this than on any other question in the survey. The other two issues most commonly chosen issues facing Phillips were "Controlling Taxes" and "Town Management"

 

Most important issues Phillips will face

Very Imp.

Important

Not Imp.

Job Opportunities

71

9

2

Controlling taxes

67

16

4

Town management

56

21

1

Loss of individual property rights

49

21

13

Welfare and poverty

50

25

5

Maintain quality of environment

44

29

2

Attractiveness of the town

38

35

5

Maintaining town's character

38

35

3

Controlling rate of development

31

20

11

Civic spirit

29

34

7

Subdivision sale of land

26

30

20

Controlling large parcel land buys

23

40

20

Reducing loitering

19

32

19

Town Services

Satisfaction

When asked how satisfied they were with Town Services, the respondents mostly satisfied. Three services stood out as being highly satisfying to the town: Snow Removal, Library and the Transfer Station. The greatest dissatisfaction was for Sidewalks, Recreational Services, Youth Services, and Street Lights.

Across the board, more respondents did not wish to spend money to improve services than respondents who noted they were will to spend money. The services that the respondents were most willing to spend money to improve were; Fire protection, Emergency medical services, sidewalk maintenance, and senior services, though there was a high level of general satisfaction for both fire and emergency services.

How satisfied are you with these Town services?

Highly Satisfied

Satisfied

Dissatisfied

Greatly Dissatisfied

Spend

Don't Spend

Fire protection

5

40

1

0

18

22

Emergency medical services

5

39

2

0

17

29

Sidewalk maintenance

3

19

17

2

15

22

Senior services

4

34

6

0

15

15

Road maintenance

11

34

4

3

14

19

Youth services

3

30

13

0

14

19

Recreational services

0

30

17

3

12

17

Snow removal

23

28

2

0

11

22

Street signs

3

31

10

7

10

21

Library

21

31

0

0

10

21

Street lighting

6

34

11

1

9

25

School system

4

24

8

0

9

16

Code enforcement

1

37

4

6

8

22

Animal control enforcement

2

29

2

3

8

21

Water system

7

33

2

0

6

23

Phone lines / Internet

5

35

5

5

6

26

Police protection

4

41

6

0

5

24

Solid waste disposal transfer station

18

39

2

0

0

18

Development

In general the respondents were not willing to have their taxes raised to develop new services, but when they said they were willing to spend money on town services is was most often for a New Town Office and a Grant Writer. There was most opposition to developing Recreational Sports Fields, Public Access to Private Lands, and a Recreation Director.

Services to be developed

Yes Tax

Yes Don't Tax

No

No Opinion

New town office

15

13

9

9

Grant writer

13

15

14

9

Town recreation director

9

14

24

3

Local Law Enforcement

8

20

18

4

Recreation sports fields

9

14

28

8

Other recreational facilities

7

23

15

4

Elderly care facilities

7

22

15

10

Affordable housing program

6

17

20

7

Town access to pond/river

7

21

9

3

Child care facilities

3

22

18

6

Public water

2

12

15

7

Public sewer

1

3

22

13

Garbage Pickup

1

9

22

7

Public access to private land

0

12

27

9

 

Recreation

When asked about what recreational / cultural activities they would like to see developed, respondents responded most favorably to Hunting/Fishing, Hiking Trails, Cross Country Trails, Bike Paths and Railroad. While more people did not want to see their taxes raised, the greatest willingness be taxed was for the development of a Community Center, Adult Ed, and Hiking Trails.

What recreational / cultural activities to be developed

Yes Tax

Yes Don't Tax

No

No Opinion

Community center

17

19

4

8

Adult Ed/Vocational

11

24

1

8

Hiking trails

9

29

2

9

Cross country ski trails

8

29

5

17

Horseback riding

8

13

6

17

Railroad

8

30

1

9

ATV/Snowmobile trails

8

25

5

6

Bike paths

6

29

3

9

Ice skating

6

24

5

14

Museums

6

17

3

13

Musical events

5

28

1

13

Tennis

5

18

6

12

Other

4

5

0

3

River recreation

4

25

5

10

Hunting / Fishing

2

46

2

11

Crafts

1

19

4

19

Bird watching

1

20

5

18

Land Use

The most agreed upon question in the survey, other than the need for jobs, was the question of whether or not to protect natural resources. More than half of the respondents wanted to see all aspects of their natural resources protected especially water and wildlife habitat.

Natural resources to protect

Very Imp

Important

Not imp

No Opinion

Protect

Don't Protect

Aquifers/ground water/clean drinking water

55

18

1

1

62

4

Wildlife habitat

43

26

3

0

55

8

Open space

42

22

1

4

51

8

Farmlands

41

27

2

2

49

10

Woodlands

40

24

3

1

59

9

Scenic areas

38

29

4

1

47

9

Riverfront lands

37

28

8

1

51

13

Historic sites/areas

33

26

5

1

51

8

Potential park or recreation land

30

28

10

2

51

10

Wetlands

29

29

12

1

47

12

 

When it came to land use preferences, respondents tended to encourage retail stores, elderly housing, professional offices and light manufacturing. They were tended to discourage auto graveyards and mobile homes.

Land use preferences

Allow Anywhere

Confine

Encourage

Discourage

Individual retail stores

15

15

24

8

Housing for elderly

13

20

24

1

Professional offices

19

13

23

0

Light manufacturing

15

20

23

2

Industrial parks

3

28

22

7

Farms

25

8